Gemini will provide immediate feedback highlighting during your practice, where you excelled and where you might need to study more.

More details available here.
Gemini will provide immediate feedback highlighting during your practice, where you excelled and where you might need to study more.

More details available here.
It is powered by the same transformer architecture as xAI's Grok model

Last year, I was trying to pitch our startup to investors in three different markets—India, the US, and Japan. Same pitch, but we needed videos in Hindi, English, and Japanese. The quote from video agencies? $15K per language. That's when I decided to build something myself.
The problem wasn't just cost. It was time. Even if we had the budget, turnaround was 3-4 weeks per video. We needed a lip sync video generator for startups that could handle multiple languages without re-shooting everything. I started experimenting with AI models in early 2026, focusing on two things: quality lip-sync and the ability to use reference footage so the output actually looked like our brand.
After months of testing different approaches, I built JXP AI Video Generator. It handles reference-based video generation—you can upload a clip or even just describe what you want, and it generates 1080p videos with proper lip-sync. No cameras, no editing software, just text or audio input.
The core feature is multi-language video localization. You create one video concept, then generate versions in different languages with matching lip movements. We're using it internally for investor updates and customer demos. It's not perfect yet—sometimes the lip-sync drifts on longer sentences—but it's saving us weeks of production time.
I'm looking for other founders who face similar challenges. If you're dealing with multi-market video content, I'd love to hear your feedback on what features would actually help.
Video content creators and startup founders face a common bottleneck in 2026: producing professional-quality videos with accurate lip sync costs thousands of dollars and weeks of production time. Whether you're recording multilingual product demos, educational content, or marketing materials, traditional video editing demands expensive equipment, skilled editors, and multiple shooting sessions. For bootstrapped startups, this financial and time burden often means delaying content strategies or settling for amateur-looking videos that fail to convert.
The emergence of reference-based AI video generation technology has fundamentally shifted how entrepreneurs approach video content. Instead of hiring production crews or learning complex editing software, modern AI video generators like Wan26 enable founders to create broadcast-quality videos in minutes. The platform's core strengths—precision lip sync video creation tool capabilities, 1080p output quality, and multi-shot editing features—address the exact pain points that drain startup resources. For companies testing messaging across different markets, the ability to generate reference-based videos with consistent quality reduces production costs by up to 80% compared to traditional methods.
Let me walk you through a practical scenario that demonstrates how multi-shot editing AI video tool technology works in a startup context. Imagine you're launching a SaaS product targeting both Indian and Southeast Asian markets. Your goal: create product explainer videos in Hindi, Tamil, and English without tripling your video budget.
Start with a single master recording of your presenter explaining the product features. This becomes your reference video. The Wan26 platform analyzes facial movements, gestures, and speaking patterns from this footage, creating a digital baseline that maintains natural expression.
Translate your script into target languages and record native-speaker voiceovers. You don't need the original presenter to re-record—the AI handles synchronization. Upload your Hindi audio track, and the system automatically adjusts lip movements to match the new language's phonetic patterns. The lip sync video creation tool ensures mouth shapes align with sounds, eliminating the uncanny valley effect common in early AI video tools.
For professional polish, use the multi-shot editing feature to combine different camera angles or insert cutaway shots. Let's say you want to show your product interface while maintaining presenter credibility. The AI seamlessly integrates screen recordings with synchronized talking-head footage, creating a cohesive narrative flow without manual keyframe editing.
Preview the generated video at 1080p resolution. The reference-based generation system preserves lighting consistency and color grading from your original footage. Most users report needing only minor tweaks—perhaps adjusting timing on specific sentences—before exporting final files ready for YouTube, LinkedIn, or paid advertising campaigns.
One DesiFounder community member recently shared results from this workflow: they produced 12 localized product videos in 72 hours for approximately $200 in tool costs and voiceover fees. The traditional alternative—hiring videographers in three cities—quoted at $18,000 with a six-week timeline. The time savings alone allowed them to launch market tests two months ahead of schedule, capturing early adopter feedback that shaped their product roadmap.
Beyond cost savings, AI video generation offers strategic flexibility that changes how startups approach content. You can test multiple value propositions by generating video variants with different scripts but identical visual quality. A/B testing becomes feasible at scale—something previously reserved for companies with substantial marketing budgets. Additionally, as your product evolves, updating videos requires only re-recording narration rather than full production reshoots.
As multi-shot editing AI video tools continue advancing in 2026 and beyond, we're seeing video content become as accessible as written blog posts once were. For resource-constrained founders, this democratization means competing on message quality and market insight rather than production budgets. The startups winning attention today aren't necessarily those with Hollywood-grade studios—they're the ones using intelligent tools to communicate value clearly, consistently, and at the pace modern markets demand. If video content has been on your "someday" list, the cost and complexity barriers have finally fallen.
I've been struggling with lip sync issues in my video projects – especially when trying to match dialogue to multiple camera angles. After weeks of experimenting with different tools, I decided to build something that could handle reference-based video generation and proper lip sync in one place.
That's how Wan26 came together. It's an AI video generator that solves the lip synchronization problem while supporting multi-shot video production. You can feed it reference footage, and it generates professional-grade videos with accurate lip movements across different angles – all exported in 1080p.
The lip sync video generator component was the trickiest part to nail down. Getting the mouth movements to feel natural rather than robotic took multiple iterations, but I'm happy with where it landed. The multi-shot editing workflow lets you piece together scenes without juggling five different apps.
Would love feedback from fellow founders who work with video content. Happy to share the demo: Wan26
I've been struggling with creating video content where the audio doesn't match the visuals properly. As someone working on marketing videos for my startup, I kept running into this frustrating issue: whenever I tried to swap audio tracks or use voiceovers, the lip movements looked completely off. It made even professional footage look amateurish and hurt credibility with potential customers.
After testing several tools that promised AI video generator with lip sync capabilities, I found Wan26 and it's genuinely solved my problem. What stood out immediately was the reference-based video generation approach – instead of creating cartoonish avatars, it works with real footage and syncs the lips perfectly to new audio tracks.
The quality difference is noticeable. I'm getting 1080p output that looks professional enough for client presentations and social media campaigns. The AI tool for multi-shot video editing feature has been particularly useful because I can maintain consistency across different camera angles in the same video, which was nearly impossible to do manually before.
The biggest win for me has been time savings. What used to take hours of trying to match audio timing now happens in minutes. The lip synchronization is accurate enough that viewers don't notice it's been edited, which was my main concern initially. For anyone dealing with similar video production challenges, you might want to check out Wan26 – it's been working well for my specific needs around creating polished video content without a huge production budget.
Cowork lets you complete non-technical tasks much like how developers use Claude Code.

In Cowork, you give Claude access to a folder on your computer. Claude can then read, edit, or create files in that folder.
Try it to create a spreadsheet from a pile of screenshots, or produce a first draft from scattered notes.
Once you've set a task, Claude makes a plan and steadily completes it, looping you in along the way.
Claude will ask before taking any significant actions so you can course-correct as needed.
Claude can use your existing connectors, which link Claude to external information.
You can also pair Cowork with Claude in Chrome for tasks that need browser access.